Type 49:  AE3.  VRBS ROMA FELIX
Roma standing, holding trophy and Victory.
404-408
Struck for Arcadius, Honorius, and Theodosius II. Struck only at Rome, with a unique exception.

Theodosius II, Rome
16 mm. 2.13 grams.

    Other images below. 

Overall this type is scarce, but almost all examples are very crowded and poorly struck. An example this nice is very rare. A full-flan and well-struck example with little wear would be extremely unusual.

For a wonderful, entertaining, and highly informative discussion of this type, see this CoinTalk thread:
    https://www.cointalk.com/threads/the-most-ironic-lrb-or-how-to-represent-the-sack-of-rome-in-your-collection.353676/

This type was originally thought to have been issued by Arcadius and Honorius in conjunction with Theodosius I, but it came to be realized that "Theodosius" was really Theodosius II. Thus it is included in RIC IX under the earlier erroneous attribution with an erroneous early date (AD 394-395) and then again in RIC X with a corrected attribution and date (404-408, given on page 130).

mint RIC A H T2       RIC X, plates 37-38
Rome IX.67-68
X.1271-1283		 2,S,R,2,R,2
R,R,4,S,S,4		 R,S,R,2
R,R,S,S,C		 R,R
2,2 		 H-VIII.18
H1275, 1281, A1278, T2-1283
Aq X.1243 5     36.1243


RIC X  lists each reverse twice, with Roma "head right" and "head facing."  RIC IX did also, with "head right" being number 67 and "head facing" being number 68.

RIC IX photos: H-VIII.18. RIC X, plates 37-38.

DOC for Arcadius, 1 piece, Table 31, "Western, 394-408," page 131.
DOC for Honorius, 3 pieces, Table 39, "Western AE, 395-423," page 207.  The third piece is of "reduced module on a thick flan." See the last image for an example for Honorius.

RIC IX and Cayon erroneously think "Theodosius" is Theodosius I, so Cayon's T-63 (no photo "17mm") and T-67 (2 photos, "15mm") are both this type.
RIC X p. 333, suggests "(?)407-408" for the R5 Honorius example from Aquileia.

DOC for Honorius: 815-817, 822-824.

Cayon A-49 (0), H-62 (0), T2 --, T-63 (0) and T-67 (2 photos).
Hunter H-88.10.
Ratto photos, Arcadius (5 full-sized) 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, and (1 reduced) 126.
 


Arcadius:
Arcadius


  16 mm. 12:00. 1.67 grams.
   RIC X 1277 (pearl-diadem/Roma head right)
   OF T
   mintmark off or unclear, but
   Rome mint anyway.
   Erroneously included in RIX IX as Rome 67c.

Arcadius  

  
  16 mm. 12:00. 1.93 grams.
  RIC X 1277 (pearl-diadem/Roma head right)
   OF E
   SMROM
   Erroneously included in RIX IX as Rome 67c.


Arcadius


   15 mm. 6:00. 2.09 grams.
   RIC X 1278 (rosette-diadem/Roma head right)
   OF S
   SMROM
   Erroneously included in RIC IX as Rome 67d.

Honorius:
Honorius  

   16 mm. 12:00. 2.52 grams.
   RIC X 1275 (rosette-diadem/Roma head right) 
   OF E
   SMROM
   Erroneously included in RIC IX as Rome 67f.


Theodosius II:


16 mm. 12:00. 2.13 grams.
RIC X 1276 (pearl-diadem/Roma head right) "R2"
   OF T
   SM ROM
Erroneously included in RIC IX as Rome 67a.

This Theodosius is in outstanding condition.




Reduced flan:
reduced

   13-12 mm. 6:00. 1.56 grams.
    Reduced flan. Cf. LRCDO 730.
    Kent (RIN 1988, p.281-294, "... bronze of Honorius" says only Honorius seems to mint these small flan pieces. Also, "Never certainly found in Britain and Northern Gaul."

 


Return to the main page.