Fun with overstrikes (Byzantine coins)
Byzantine copper coins were often struck using older coins as flans. When both types are identifiable, which is pretty often, we can tell which type should be dated earlier. Often an overstruck coin is a garbled mess, but sometimes we get lucky and the overtype is still fairly clear and the undertype is, nevertheless, identifiable. Here are two examples.
Alexius over Alexius. Alexius I , 1081-1181, was the Byzantine emperor during the First Crusade and we have many interesting stories about his reign. Numismatically his reign is special because in 1092 he initiated a coin reform that replaced all the previous denominations. Even before the reform he issued folles with his name after issuing anonymous folles without his name. Next is a "named" follis of Alexius overstruck on an anonymous Class K follis, also attributed to Alexius.
Alexius I, 1081-1118
26-22 mm. 6.27 grams.
Bust of Virgin facing, infant Christ on her lap
MP [ΘV] either side
/Emperor standing front, holding labaum
AΛЄΧΙ to left [ΔЄCΠOT TωK is not visible on the right]
Sear 1909
The large beads around the rim of the Class K undertype are easily visible on both sides.


Romanus IV, 1068-1071, Class G, over Constantine X, 1057-1059. Romanus IV is famous for losing the disasterous Battle of Manzikert in 1071.
This type is the undertype of the overstrike, next.
Constantine X, Ducas, 1057-1059
27-26 mm. 10.78 grams.
Bust of emperor facing, holding cross
+KωΝ RACI- ΛЄVC O ΔOVK ["R"in "RACI" is an epigraphic form of "B"]
Constantine Basileus (Emperor) the Ducas
The obverse is double-struck with the top 60% of one strike clear and well-centered
over a strike of the same die tilted and lower down so the hand holding the cross appears twice and the loros is at an angle.
/Facing bust of Christ.
Sear 1854
This is a fairly clear Class G anonymous follis, attributed to Romanus IV (1068-1071).
Class G, Sear 1867